Turn cincinnati corruption here local ohio union

cincinnati corruption here local ohio union

Good riddance to the ACORN corporate entities that filed for bankruptcy, but bankruptcy filing is no excuse for continuing to keep from the American people the truth about ACORN, Obama and the Obama presidential campaign that should have been generally known BEFORE Election Day 2008. “As if the news about ACORN in the last few weeks has not been troubling enough, a look back at an October 2008 Pennsylvania injunction hearing against ACORN provides even more reasons why the House must have a stand-alone vote on the Defund ACORN Act so that Democratic leaders sympathetic to ACORN cannot hold the Defund ACORN Act hostage to a government takeover of student loans. “The injunction hearing included testimony from former ACORN employee Anita Moncrief, who worked in the group’s Washington, DC, office and had first-hand knowledge of its operations and offered a disturbing look at how ACORN works. Moncrief testified that ‘Project Vote is a sister organization of ACORN. But as I was there, I learned there wasn’t much of a difference.’ Moncrief also said that ‘[h]onestly, there really isn’t a difference between Project Vote and ACORN except for the fact that one is a 501 c 3 and one is not a c 3 . As far as the – who does the voter registration work and how things get done, their – Project Vote is basically considered ACORN political operations.’ Moncrief also testified when asked if there was active cooperation between ACORN’s political wing and Project Vote that ‘… we’re considered basically the same staff. local and the national side separate from Project Vote so it looked like it was two separate offices.’ Moncrief testified that ACORN entities that are forbidden by law from engaging in political activities because of their tax status do in fact engage in political activities ‘[b]ecause there’s no separation between the organizations for real. It was just — I don’t want to say business as usual, but it was a lot of collaboration between the organizations.’ Moncrief also testified that ‘[t]hey wanted to keep the – I think the word was keep the 501 c 3 pristine and keep that clean and separated from everything else because we needed that.’ When asked if ACORN actually did that, Moncrief said ‘[p]ublicly, yes, they always stated that it was two different organizations’ but that they weren’t in actual practice and that she was told ‘let’s hope we don’t get caught.’ Moncrief testimony, Monica Moyer, et al v. When asked how money flows between ACORN affiliates, Moncrief testified that ‘[t]he money goes into accounts at CCI [Citizens Consulting Incorporated, ACORN’s for-profit accounting arm]. All of that goes through CCI.’ When asked how ACORN entities receive money, Moncrief testified that ‘CCI makes disbursements to them either directly into their account or does transfers between I guess the different organizations.’ In 2007, Moncrief was tasked with reconciling accounts using ACORN’s accounting software called NewVision. So there’s really no way at this point without a forensic audit to tell what are the assets of any one of the ACORN entities.’ Moncrief testimony, Monica Moyer, et al v. so I want you to put this on letterhead – on ACORN letterhead and say something like, we had a really great time working with our partner, Project Vote. There might have been – on paper there might have been a partnership going on, but really it was ACORN and Project Vote together. Moncrief testified that ACORN officials were aware that duplicate voter registrations were being obtained by canvassers hired by ACORN, and said that ‘… they were striving for at one time 40 percent accuracy rate. So 40 percent was okay.’ Moncrief also described the attitude of ACORN officials regarding the practice of ‘dumping’ large amounts of voter registration cards on election offices: ‘Well, I was told when I was working on the provisional voting survey that they already had a bad opinion of us because we would send so many cards over to them. So I wouldn’t name myself.’ Moncrief also testified that national officials with ACORN and Project Vote were aware of fraudulent voter registrations, and that absentee ballots are sometimes fraudulently voted. In her testimony, Moncrief described two ACORN programs that were both known as ‘Muscle for Money.’ Moncrief said that ‘[t]he first one is the official program, which is where they calculate the number of – the cost for registering voters, the cost for GOTV, and how close the elections were in certain states. And they would use – they would say give us the money, we’re the muscle, we’ll get out there and get it done.’ Moncrief also described a second, ‘unofficial’ ACORN program also known as ‘Muscle for Money.’ Moncrief said that ‘[t]hey got involved with a group called the Carlyle Group. And instead of, you know, reforming the way they did the rapid anticipation loans, they ended up giving money to the ACORN tax sites which paid for new computers and money to run these tax filing sites around the country.’ Moncrief testified that ACORN’s unofficial ‘Muscle for Money’ program was known by another name: ‘Protection. And it’s not that we thought it was funny, it was just one of those things that we talked about.’ Moncrief also testified that ACORN officials tried to use the voter registration program as a foil to divert attention away from the unofficial “Muscle for Money” program. And at the meeting in 2007, there was actually a conversation about how you can make sure everyone was on the same page of how to respond to that because those responses like, oh, you don’t want African Americans to vote or you don’t want minorities to vote or things where it’s very hard to come back at and they were good at fighting that.’ Moncrief testimony, Monica Moyer, et al v. Moncrief testified that ACORN employees were given talking points on how to discuss employees accused of voter registration fraud. IS THE PURPOSE OF ACORN VOTER REGISTRATION DRIVES TO REGISTER NEW VOTERS OR TO RECRUIT NEW MEMBERS FOR ACORN, AND DOES ACORN USE A QUOTA SYSTEM FOR THESE REGISTRATION DRIVES? … They get – the Project Vote side gets money from certain liberal organizations or – to run these voter registration drives.’ ACORN Pennsylvania Political Director Krista Holub testified that voter registration applications distributed by ACORN employees include ACORN membership applications. Moncrief also testified that ACORN uses a quota system with canvassers during voter registration drives, saying ‘I’m not exactly sure how many cards per day, but I know that at the minimum, I’ve – I’m aware of at least 20 cards per day’ and that if canvassers don’t turn in the minimum amount ‘[y]ou get fired.’ Moncrief testimony, Monica Moyer, et al v. The last number I heard was 176, but that’s constantly changing.’ When asked if Project Vote is a separate corporate entity from, but yet an affiliate of, ACORN, Moncrief said ‘Correct. Those – we’d get those types of lists.’ When asked from which presidential campaigns Project Vote received donor lists, Moncrief said ‘Kerry, Clinton, and the Obama campaign.’ Moncrief testimony, Monica Moyer, et al v. DO ACORN OFFICIALS BELIEVE THAT ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS ABOUT ACORN IS THAT IT FIGHTS CAPITALISM? Included in the notes is a list of reasons the group who met thought that ACORN was ‘good.’ One of the reasons listed was ‘Fighting capitalism.’ Moncrief testimony,Monica Moyer, et al v. Good riddance to the ACORN corporate entities that filed for bankruptcy, but bankruptcy filing is no excuse for continuing to keep from the American people the truth about ACORN, Obama and the Obama presidential campaign that should have been generally known BEFORE Election Day 2008.
cincinnati corruption here local ohio union cincinnati corruption here local ohio union
Tags: Turn cincinnati corruption here local ohio union
| Some Articles: cincinnati corruption here local ohio union | Original post: cincinnati corruption here local ohio union | Technorati tag: cincinnati corruption here local ohio union | Virgilio tag: cincinnati corruption here local ohio union